TECHNOMALIST
Venture-backed startups are more likely to engage in fraudulent activity than their non-VC-funded counterparts, and the investors themselves bear significant responsibility, according to new research detailed by TechCrunch.
A report from Imperial College London and Emlyon Business School examined civil and criminal securities fraud prosecutions by the SEC and DOJ from 2000 to 2023, mapping patterns of deception among founders. The study identifies a progression of dishonest behavior it terms “façading,” which ranges from inflated claims during fundraising to fabricating entire technological capabilities.
Tim Weiss, an Imperial College researcher and co-author of the report, told TechCrunch that “fraud is much more common and normalized in the startup world than we are ready to admit and accept.”
A separate study from the University of Toronto, also published in June, analyzed 654 fraud cases against U.S. VC-backed startups over the same period. While fraud remains rare overall, companies with venture funding were more likely to face charges. Notably, startups launched during overheated markets with lax oversight and due diligence were 19% more likely to later commit fraud.
Weiss emphasized that founders are not solely to blame. “The problem here is not just the founders but also those that set and reinforce, at times unreasonable, expectations of high growth,” he said. He warned that current frothy conditions in AI investing mirror the environments that tempt misconduct.
The Imperial College paper describes three escalating stages of façading. Surface façading involves lying about a company’s traction during early pitches. Reinforced façading sees founders create fake contracts, invoices, and revenue to support earlier falsehoods—one cited example involved a mobile testing app that engineered documents to secure unicorn valuation. Deep façading extends deception to technology itself, with staged demos that construct what Weiss called “parallel realities.”
Investors sometimes inadvertently enable fraud. The research found that backers who continue to fund founders with prior misconduct allegations “co-create fraud” and normalize the behavior. The University of Toronto study found “little evidence” that alleged fraud hinders founders from raising money for new ventures, even when cases draw wide media attention. “New investors and the broader VC market do not penalize past misconduct,” the report states, aligning with a Silicon Valley culture of embracing failure regardless of cause.
Governance structures matter: startups with founder-controlled boards were twice as likely to commit fraud as those with investor or shared control. After going public, VC-backed companies face more securities class-action lawsuits within two years than private-equity-backed firms that IPO. Longer stretches as private companies reduce the scrutiny that public markets provide.
Weiss proposed that the SEC routinely investigate startups once they pass a significant funding threshold, rather than waiting for whistleblower reports or lawsuits. The paper also calls for investors to be held liable for governance failures and fiduciary breaches, advocating for more research into “entrepreneur-investor dynamics” to balance narratives that pin wrongdoing exclusively on founders.
Fraud, the reports suggest, is rarely a solo act. Until investor accountability matches the pressure they apply, the temptation for founders to fake progress will likely persist.
See an error? Read our corrections policy or email [email protected].
